Why not Fusion? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 01:01:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Why not Fusion? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you support 'fusion'?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
#3
it is not an important issue
 
#4
undecided
 
#5
all other answers
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Why not Fusion?  (Read 3591 times)
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« on: May 18, 2007, 11:29:06 AM »


I say scrap the party concept and go back to the beginning, where people voted on the individual, and the runner up would become VP.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2007, 01:51:37 PM »


I say scrap the party concept and go back to the beginning, where people voted on the individual, and the runner up would become VP.

President Bush and Vice-President Kerry? President Reagan and Vice-President Mondale? and my favorite...President Nixon and Vice-President McGovern.

Your idea would certainly make the U.S. government more interesting.

You bet it would.  Of course, if that system was in place back then, who knows what the combination would have been.  You could still have ended up with Reagan/Bush because Bush out performed Mondale in the polls, etc.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.