As it's amusing for Mechaman to watch Liberals and Cosnervatives argue, it's amusing for me to watch two Libertarians duke it out to say what's Libertarian and what isn't.
Who's duking it out with regard to "what's Libertarian and what isn't?" That's not what's going on.
It's just a bit baffling to consider some of the candidates wormyguy is supporting as a libertarian.
I certainly can't see any reason to have voted for Meg Whitman.
See, he's a Republican, and Meg Whitman was the Republican candidate. I can certainly see the reason.
I'm not arguing for or against voting for Whitman (though I most likely would have voted for her), I'm saying that it's amusing just to sit back and watch two Libertarians (I'm assuming Libertas is basically Libertarian) fight over what's Libertarians and what's not, specifically because it has no beargin on the rest of the world unless you're a Libertarian.
