Should Anti-Abortion Advertising be Banned? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 08:27:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should Anti-Abortion Advertising be Banned? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
#2
No
#3
Only graphic advertising should be banned
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Should Anti-Abortion Advertising be Banned?  (Read 1679 times)
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


« on: January 13, 2014, 11:14:13 PM »

If I spelled out my fulling opinion here, I'd come off as the cold asshole I am, but my position is known.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2014, 11:34:38 PM »

All advertising should be banned as it is a completely wasteful form of economic activity.

Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2014, 01:05:17 AM »

No, because the government shouldn't be regulating on this. That being said, I would hope that organizations who post such graphic images in public places receive enough pressure to take it down. Some of the pro-life pictures I've seen before simply aren't suitable for children.

Children Schmildren. Soon we'll be banning all the good movies, too.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2014, 01:54:39 AM »

No, because the government shouldn't be regulating on this. That being said, I would hope that organizations who post such graphic images in public places receive enough pressure to take it down. Some of the pro-life pictures I've seen before simply aren't suitable for children.

Children Schmildren. Soon we'll be banning all the good movies, too.

And the video games. "Think of the children!" is probably the quickest path to tyranny, or at the very least to nanny statism.

The second being a category of the first.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2014, 03:26:14 PM »

No, because the government shouldn't be regulating on this. That being said, I would hope that organizations who post such graphic images in public places receive enough pressure to take it down. Some of the pro-life pictures I've seen before simply aren't suitable for children.

Children Schmildren. Soon we'll be banning all the good movies, too.

And the video games. "Think of the children!" is probably the quickest path to tyranny, or at the very least to nanny statism.

The second being a category of the first.

Conservatives think it would be OK if GLAAD started buying billboards in Texas depicting explicit gay sex scenes.  Interesting...

If whoever is willing to sell them, I guess. I mean, it'd be pretty sick (not in the good sense), but it's not my conscience.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2014, 06:54:48 PM »

No, because the government shouldn't be regulating on this. That being said, I would hope that organizations who post such graphic images in public places receive enough pressure to take it down. Some of the pro-life pictures I've seen before simply aren't suitable for children.

Children Schmildren. Soon we'll be banning all the good movies, too.

And the video games. "Think of the children!" is probably the quickest path to tyranny, or at the very least to nanny statism.

The second being a category of the first.

Conservatives think it would be OK if GLAAD started buying billboards in Texas depicting explicit gay sex scenes.  Interesting...

If whoever is willing to sell them, I guess. I mean, it'd be pretty sick (not in the good sense), but it's not my conscience.

If you can acknowledge that certain things are better not shoved in people's faces, I don't see the problem with some common-sensical restrictions IE No dead babies, no frontal nudity. 

And take all the character out if ads!? Won't be long before they remove pictures altogether.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 15 queries.