What did "liberal" mean to voters in 1988? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 03:52:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  What did "liberal" mean to voters in 1988? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What did "liberal" mean to voters in 1988?  (Read 580 times)
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,354
United States


« on: October 07, 2017, 09:19:33 AM »

1. Crime was a major issue in the 1988 Presidential campaign and liberal was successfully conflated with being "soft-on-crime"
2. "Liberal" also could mean being a relic from a bygone era where do-gooders tried to solve complex social problems with greater government involvement. I don't know if it was Ed Koch or Dave Horowitz who referred to as being "mugged by reality", and in Ed Koch's case, his perspective on low-income housing in the '60's or '70's pushed him to the right.
3. I am sure there was some residual image of an "anti-war" fanatic.

Even Michael Dukakis ran, as I recall, having been branded by certain media outlets favorable to him, as "post-liberal"--a technocrat who would solve problems through competence, rather than ideology. He did not successfully escape the label, obviously.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.