77. Gerymandering. I don't buy the idea that judges are automatically politically impartial. This does have the interesting twist that the judges are drawn by lot from a pool, so they could be biased overwhelmingly Repbulican, overwhelmining democratic, actually have some good ideas, or have some weird half-assed ideas. Might be well suited for Nevada . The lack of any sort of interviening voter approval kills it for me.
Retired judges could apply to serve as special masters. 24 would be drawn by lot, with at most 12 from a single party.
Four legislative leaders (Speaker, Senator pro tem, and the minority leaders of the two houses) then each select 3 judges, who must not be of their own party (Democrats pick the non-Democrats, and Republicans pick the non-Republicans). If a leader fails to select 3 judges, their choices will be made by lot, maintaining the opposite party rule.
The legislative leaders could then peremptorily strike one judge selected by another leader. The final 3-member panel would then be chosen by lot, with at least one from each of the two major parties.
Has a redistricting plan ever been overturned by the voters? I don't see any provision in the current Constitution that would provide by voter review other than by an initiative. This proposal includes an automatic vote on any plan at the next election.