PMRC: Opinion of the political party reform (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 11:53:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  PMRC: Opinion of the political party reform (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: (1) Is the Atlasian political landscape better than it was before the major parties' dissolution? (2) Would you characterize those efforts as being a "success"?
#1
(1) Things are better
 
#2
(1) Things are about the same
 
#3
(1) Things are worse
 
#4
(1) Don't know/no opinion
 
#5
(2) The reforms have been successful
 
#6
(2) The reforms have not been successful
 
#7
(2) Don't know/no opinion
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 26

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: PMRC: Opinion of the political party reform  (Read 3123 times)
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


« on: May 16, 2012, 10:23:44 AM »

Things are better and dissolution has been a success - for now. But in order to remain on a good track we need to make sure that the new parties remain ideologically identifiable and don't become big-tent parties.

This is why I've hoped (and am still hoping) that a center-right party appears which complements the Whig Party. Sort of like the Moderate Party, just with more active leaders who are willing to bring the party forward.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2012, 11:16:25 AM »
« Edited: May 16, 2012, 11:20:01 AM by Assemblyman of the Mideast ZuWo »

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2012, 03:27:54 PM »

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?

I'd like to say that the Whig party is considerably more social-conservative than it is economic-conservative, at least through my intention.

Both the average social and economic score are clearly on the plus side, for what it's worth. But you raise an important point, we have to specify our economic platform in our party thread.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2012, 05:51:04 AM »

If HappyWarrior ends up joining the Labor Party I demand to be offered honorary membership in that party! Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.