Would it be problematic for Republicans to elect Jeb Bush in 2016?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

This doesn't seem to bother Republicans since Jeb Bush makes many of them seriously wet for some inexplicable reason, but I would certainly hope it would bother most other people.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Some of our rightists remain unaware that value judgments and cultural phenomena other than legalism exist, film at eleven.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Some of our rightists remain unaware that value judgments and cultural phenomena other than legalism exist, film at eleven.

Arrogant liberal thinks he knows what's best for everyone and can determine society's value judgments and cultural phenomena even though society and culture decided otherwise.

Film at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9:30. Matinee pricing before 5.

When did society and culture decide otherwise on this issue? The Bush family does not in fact de-facto dynastically rule America or the Republican Party.

You are of course not answering the point that the question was 'would it be problematic?', not 'would it be illegal?', but you're just going to マイペースする your merry way through life regardless of what anybody else says anyway.

I'm not a 'liberal', and I most certainly do know better than vast segments of the population of this benighted world.