The Wesleyan Quadrilateral

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I'm generally well-disposed towards it, but it's obviously imperfect because I think the whole usual Protestant approach to the idea of the primacy of Scripture is flawed. I prefer to look at Scripture and Tradition as an organic process which Reason and Experience inform.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I'm an Adventist, so it makes a lot of sense to me.  I agree with Nathan that I personally (despite some disagreements with my church) look first to Scriptures as the basis for all else, then to tradition.  However, I believe reason and experience are extremely valuable in order to validate your faith.

I think you might be misunderstanding my position slightly. I don't look to Scriptures as the basis for all else so much as I view the Bible as a part of Holy Tradition, which is also informed by reason and experience. I don't view them as intrinsically separate sources because I view each as reliant on the other three.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Experience is removed from the Episcopal version. 

The Hooker version, yeah. Wesley came after Hooker. It really depends on what Anglican you talk to.