Is having an anti-complimentarianism litmus test sound or narrow minded? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 02:52:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Is having an anti-complimentarianism litmus test sound or narrow minded? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is having an anti-complimentarianism litmus test sound or narrow minded?
#1
Sound and valid
 
#2
Narrow minded
 
#3
Very narrow minded and bigoted
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 12

Author Topic: Is having an anti-complimentarianism litmus test sound or narrow minded?  (Read 382 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,547


« on: January 14, 2014, 05:06:39 PM »

Having it as a litmus test in terms of one's own denominational membership is reasonable--there are indeed a lot of Episcopalians who were once Catholic and while not all of them converted for this reason it's definitely a contributing factor for quite a few--but refusing to see any value in other aspects of the theology or culture of a complementarian church is narrow-minded and silly, regardless of whether one has a background in it or not. I'd say the same to somebody who had a pro-complementarianism litmus test, with the difference being that I'd, well, disagree with them.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.