On Censorship (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 04:55:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  On Censorship (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: On Censorship  (Read 9370 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,550


« on: January 08, 2015, 07:33:34 PM »

Despite everything that had been said, the brilliant people who animated Charlie Hebdo knew all well  the legitimate limits of freedom of expression. Their drawings were often crude and provocative, but never hateful. Despite their old slogan, they were anything but "dumb and mean". They were animated by values of universal solidarity and peaceful coexistence. Yes, they were militant anticlericals, but frankly I don't think that's the main point. They opposed organized religions because they saw them as forces of hatred and oppression. That's their legacy IMO.
Those limits being?

Hate speech. Charlie Hebdo never engaged in hateful drawings or commentary, and had a policy of attacking ideas and beliefs rather than groups of people.

I trust you on this since you knew what Charlie Hebdo was before this happened and I didn't, but I think it's worth pointing out that this is often a finer line than we like to think.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.