Favourite latest post by previous poster

[Napoleon]

Idaho:



Northern Idaho:



1: 57.5% McCain, 39.5% Obama = Safe R
5: 61.1% McCain, 36.1% Obama = Safe R
6: 49.8% Obama, 47.4% McCain = Toss-Up
7: 62.8% McCain, 35.1% Obama = Safe R

Coeur d'Alene Close-Up:



2: 53.4% McCain, 44.3% Obama = Likely R
3: 67.9% McCain, 29.9% Obama = Safe R
4: 64.3% McCain, 33.3% Obama = Safe R

Boise and Suburbs Close-Up:



8: 55.3% Obama, 42.4% McCain = Lean D
9: 69.1% Obama, 28.4% McCain = Safe D
10: 50.7% Obama, 47.2% McCain = Toss-Up
11: 49.9% Obama, 47.5% McCain = Toss-Up
12: 64.6% McCain, 33.8% Obama = Safe R
13: 58.2% McCain, 40.0% Obama = Safe R
14: 63.1% McCain, 34.9% Obama = Safe R
15: 63.8% McCain, 34.2% Obama = Safe R
16: 62.1% McCain, 35.5% Obama = Safe R
17: 60.1% McCain, 37.8% Obama = Safe R
18: 67.0% McCain, 30.7% Obama = Safe R
19: 68.4% McCain, 30.0% Obama = Safe R
20: 71.0% McCain, 26.7% Obama = Safe R

Twin Falls Close-Up:



21: 62.2% McCain, 35.4% Obama = Safe R

Pocatello/Idaho Falls Close-Up:



28: 49.1% McCain, 48.0% Obama = Lean R
30: 63.0% McCain, 34.5% Obama = Safe R
31: 62.6% McCain, 35.2% Obama = Safe R
33: 84.7% McCain, 13.0% Obama = Safe R

Southern Idaho:



22: 69.1% McCain, 28.5% Obama = Safe R
23: 65.9% McCain, 31.3% Obama = Safe R
24: 70.0% McCain, 27.9% Obama = Safe R
25: 76.8% McCain, 20.7% Obama = Safe R
26: 69.7% McCain, 27.8% Obama = Safe R
27: 50.3% McCain, 47.4% Obama = Likely R
29: 74.5% McCain, 22.4% Obama = Safe R
32: 74.0% McCain, 23.3% Obama = Safe R
34: 75.7% McCain, 22.0% Obama = Safe R
35: 73.5% McCain, 24.3% Obama = Safe R

31.5/35  = 90% R

[Napoleon]

Where y'at, dawlin? Here's how we tawk in Nawlins. For Mardi Graw we went to catch beads on da nutra ground side of da street. But my gawd, ya'll, somma dem girls were hawt. Then we went to go have crawfish and ersters ova by ma maw-maw an dem. Anyways, we didn't go up da road to Metry.

[Napoleon]

Incompetent failure.

Putin?

[Napoleon]

Death Penalty

Medical testing on animals

[Napoleon]

Absolutely horrible. It blows minor incidents (and non-incidents) out of proportion.

Also, the emphasis is usually on the wrong items. For example, zero tolerance for cursing, while hesitating to punish bullying. Not only is that standard morally wrong, but antithetical to the standards of the real world, i.e. not preparing kids for adulthood.

On a larger scale, I'm not against appropriate discipline of children, but I think our society is too focused on stopping misbehaving children, where we don't focus enough on having punishments proportional to the offense. The fact that we use corporal punishment for children, but not for criminals, is because of this.

[Napoleon]

The Japanese internments disqualify him f from the number one spot

[Napoleon]

This doesn't really change anything.

[Napoleon]

I hope that those voting AYE on putting back in the wording they just voted to remove at least recognize the irony of their position, given the subject: you change your minds now so that you wont be able to change your minds on some final vote. 

[Napoleon]

I don't get it.

It's a reference to Portal 2.

*SKIP*

[Napoleon]

The important object I lost in the dump was my virginity.

You lost your virginity at a waste management facility?

[Napoleon]

You know what's weird? In a way, I kind of like Bill Maher. And yet, if he wasn't "such a big meanie", I would probably hate him.

[Napoleon]

Terrible President.  Massive HP.

[Napoleon]

Currently watching some HBO, and I gotta say easy FS vote right here!  Naked women making out with each other is one of the things that makes America truly great!  Vote FS if you agree!

[Napoleon]

Inks thinks that Snowstalker's harmless thread should get 4 infraction points.

He also thinks oldies' disgusting posts about punishing women for being raped should get 0 infraction points.

Inks thinks posting profanity should receive at least 1 infraction point.

He also thinks oldies' disgusting posts about punishing women for being raped should get 0 infraction points.

He needs to be removed as a moderator.