House Republicans who voted against cutting food stamp program (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 09:13:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  House Republicans who voted against cutting food stamp program (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: House Republicans who voted against cutting food stamp program  (Read 1806 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« on: September 19, 2013, 07:55:42 PM »
« edited: September 20, 2013, 03:46:06 PM by Badger »

Watch this freeloading sloth in action.


Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2013, 09:15:24 PM »

83% of all food stamp benefits go to households with children, the elderly, or the disabled. The fraud rate of the SNAP program is just 1%. And there are strict limits on how long the unemployed can receive benefits.

Fox's airing of some California surfer is obviously a disingenuous attempt to portray all food stamp recipients as lazy bums, especially when the phrase "the new face of food stamps" is used. There's absolutely nothing representative about that guy.

Krazen logic: Anecdotes are always representative of the norm, especially if it involves food stamp programs or voter fraud.

Nothing anecdotal at all. The Clinton requirements have been waived in favor of extended parasitic leeching.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2013, 09:24:56 PM »

83% of all food stamp benefits go to households with children, the elderly, or the disabled. The fraud rate of the SNAP program is just 1%. And there are strict limits on how long the unemployed can receive benefits.

Fox's airing of some California surfer is obviously a disingenuous attempt to portray all food stamp recipients as lazy bums, especially when the phrase "the new face of food stamps" is used. There's absolutely nothing representative about that guy.

In what is a curiosity, there have been large swarms of, err, 'disabled' declaring back pain or some other malady in order to siphon free cash from the public dole.


Thankfully, this is self-correcting. Sometime before Barry leaves office, Social Security disability will go belly up and kick in automatic spending cuts.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2013, 09:57:41 PM »

83% of all food stamp benefits go to households with children, the elderly, or the disabled. The fraud rate of the SNAP program is just 1%. And there are strict limits on how long the unemployed can receive benefits.

Fox's airing of some California surfer is obviously a disingenuous attempt to portray all food stamp recipients as lazy bums, especially when the phrase "the new face of food stamps" is used. There's absolutely nothing representative about that guy.

Krazen logic: Anecdotes are always representative of the norm, especially if it involves food stamp programs or voter fraud.

Nothing anecdotal at all. The Clinton requirements have been waived in favor of extended parasitic leeching.

Wrong again, idiot.

Awww, making up nonsensical garbage again? Not surprised. Even liberals admit the truth. Barry enabled these lazies.



 However, the 2009 stimulus law and waivers later allowed by the Obama administration have suspended those requirements in most states.

Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2013, 09:10:56 PM »

The moochers live a good life.

Link

In a follow-up email, Greenslate lamented that Fox had portrayed him as a beach bum. "I don't feel like a bum," he said. "I pull hot chicks, drive nice cars, dress nice and wear the most baddest jewelry in the world."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.