Redalgo
Sr. Member
Posts: 2,681
|
 |
« on: September 01, 2012, 10:38:51 PM » |
|
Would you think it wise, perhaps, to specify the crimes in nature should be felonious in their severity so as to avoid dropping the hammer on those whose acts have little if any tangible impact on the lives of others, or do you reckon the present language is proper? Also, if I may kindly ask, shouldn't we distinguish between the CEOs of business that are very small, large, and so on since possessing that executive position in and of itself does not necessarily imply that one's benefits are going to be lavish or even generous to any controversial degree? I'd certainly like to voice my support for the underlying spirit of this bill, but there might still be a handful of kinks to deal with before this is ready for a final vote further down the line. Yeah?
|
