Hillary: Removing Assad in Syria Is Top Priority

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Because removing Saddam in Iraq went so swimmingly.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/1.678985

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Is this even a credible source?

Haaretz is like the Israeli New York Times.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Reuters says the same thing, guys.

Presidential candidate Clinton says removing Assad in Syria is No. 1 priority
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/05/us-usa-election-clinton-syria-idUSKCN0RZ1C020151005

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

This line was present in both articles (which OP conveniently left out):

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wouldn't want to point out anything that challenged the narrative, would we?

We're not going to diplomatically remove Assad. And she called for no fly zones where Russian planes are flying, which is too much of "stupid stuff" for Obama.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Once again, "anti-war" types coming out of the woodwork to support a bloody dictator.

Do you think the Iraq war was a good thing? Just because we don't support some 2 trillion war against a country means that we're fans of their leader.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

If you go after Assad, that's good news for ISIS.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Increasingly desperate, I see, Jfern.

I posted this over a month ago.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Is this even a credible source?

yes, it's a credible source. Haaretz is a major publication in Israel and is a well respected center-left media source.

Exactly. Not a credible source.

It's also in Reuters.