Democratic Congress Likely to be Far More Conservative Than Its Leadership (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:15:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Democratic Congress Likely to be Far More Conservative Than Its Leadership (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic Congress Likely to be Far More Conservative Than Its Leadership  (Read 1571 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,875


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: November 06, 2006, 05:08:21 PM »

Oh great, we lost the House and Senate in 1994 because of DINOs who killed Clinton's health care plan. The GOP has been so success because they are ideological driven. We can't fight the Republicans with spineless DINOs.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,875


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2006, 05:15:12 PM »

Right on cue....

Oh great, we lost the House and Senate in 1994 because of DINOs who killed Clinton's health care plan. The GOP has been so success because they are ideological driven. We can't fight the Republicans with spineless DINOs.
-----------------------

This thread wouldn't be complete without jfern mouthing his talking points over and over and over and over.....


Do you have any rebuttal to the fact that in 1994, conservative Democrats lost by the droves?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,875


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2006, 05:20:05 PM »

If the Dems weren't running DINOs, they wouldn't be very likely to win the House with the present gerrymanders in place.

Tester isn't a DINO and he's leading in Montana. Brown isn't a DINO and he's leading big time in Ohio. One doesn't need DINOs to win in conservative areas. For example Senator Church of Idaho and Senator Yarbourgh of Texas.


Right on cue....

Oh great, we lost the House and Senate in 1994 because of DINOs who killed Clinton's health care plan. The GOP has been so success because they are ideological driven. We can't fight the Republicans with spineless DINOs.
-----------------------

This thread wouldn't be complete without jfern mouthing his talking points over and over and over and over.....


Do you have any rebuttal to the fact that in 1994, conservative Democrats lost by the droves?

That would be in part because all of you lefty Democrats backstabbed the moderates by gerrymandering districts to gain more left-wing districts. See, oh, the entire South, for example. Just thought you should be reminded of that. Tongue

Are you saying that liberals completely controlled the South in 1991 and 1992?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,875


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2006, 09:47:10 PM »

It is good that the leadership is supposedly liberal. Hopefully they can convince the rank and file to not do brain-dead stuff like supporting warmonger and torture. Otherwise, we might as well have a Republican congress. A lot of these conservative Democrats have no leadership ability.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.