Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:05:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: More bitter/tougher defeat?
#1
Al Gore
 
#2
Hillary Clinton
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 122

Author Topic: Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016  (Read 4941 times)
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


« on: December 23, 2016, 11:10:01 PM »

Without a doubt, Gore. I don't think he ran such a dumpster fire campaign, and the circumstances (while in my opinion legitimate-I interned for some of the key people involved in the Bush campaign's Florida recount and I don't think their loyalty to the Bushes outweigh their loyalty to the principles of democracy) were somewhat murkier.

Of course, Gore had the opportunity to make a comeback in 2004 and 2008, and even still is the subject of some rather fantastical 2016/2020 speculation. Hillary is finished. That is worth noting.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.