If you could change the winner of an election... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 11:53:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  If you could change the winner of an election... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If you could change the winner of an election...  (Read 19595 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: July 11, 2004, 08:12:16 PM »

The 2 major ones...

- 1976 to Ford
- 1960 to Nixon
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2004, 10:56:36 AM »

True, but who knows...maybe Dole wouldn't have run. None of us know for sure. By the way, Wakie, you wanted Al Smith to win in 1928 and I'm guessing you would have liked to see him re-elected. Well chances are if that did happen, the Dems wouldn't have their beloved FDR. I can live with that, but can you?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2004, 04:55:21 PM »

I would want Hoover to run in 1920, not Harding.

Hoover would have lost in 1920.  Harding won on his charisma.

Hoover was the most popular man in America in 1920. Both parties wanted to nominate him.

There was a plan for a Democratic team of Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt.

You know too much, PBrunsel. Seriously...I'm a political junkie and never knew that. I was wondering...what got you so interested in President Hoover?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2004, 04:59:23 PM »

I got interested in Hoover in 5th grade when I visited hsi presidential library in West Branch, Iowa.

Another reason is that he is vilified by the left, so I wanted to know a lot about him to disarm their arguments. Smiley

Seriously, Herbert Hoover is a better person than John Kerry or Hillary Clinton who constantly attack him.

I'll be honest...I always put him in the worst President's column with Harding and Buchanan.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2004, 05:04:08 PM »

I got interested in Hoover in 5th grade when I visited hsi presidential library in West Branch, Iowa.

Another reason is that he is vilified by the left, so I wanted to know a lot about him to disarm their arguments. Smiley

Seriously, Herbert Hoover is a better person than John Kerry or Hillary Clinton who constantly attack him.

I'll be honest...I always put him in the worst President's column with Harding and Buchanan.

That's your choice. If I enter politcs and go to Congress, I will introduce a bill making a Herbert Hoover Memorial in Washington, D.C.

The only thing I knew about him was the Great Depression and record job loss. Never looked at anything else, really. Perhaps I should read up on him since he might not be that bad.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2004, 05:28:07 PM »

I got interested in Hoover in 5th grade when I visited hsi presidential library in West Branch, Iowa.

Another reason is that he is vilified by the left, so I wanted to know a lot about him to disarm their arguments. Smiley

Seriously, Herbert Hoover is a better person than John Kerry or Hillary Clinton who constantly attack him.
I've never heard Kerry or Clinton attack him.

Kerry attacked him a lot. Comparing Bush to Hoover when it came to job loss.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.