An excellent photo essay extolling reasons for living in a red state, HockeyDude. However, believe it or not, red states do have cities and blue states do have rural areas.
I'm aware of this. But if one is going to do this exercise, one must be compelled to speak in generalities. If we are going to talk blue and red, then we should be talking REALLY blue and red, and ignore swing states that are hard to define.
Now, please tell me. Where are you more likely to find trailer parks vs. huge cities? Upscale college towns vs. desolate intersections? Boring cookie-cutter exurbs vs. coastal metropolises?
If you nitpick you can't even answer the question.
You seem to have missed my main point which is that I think trailer parks, lonely intersections, and exurbs are in general better than huge cities, pretentious college towns, and coastal metropolises. SF and NY may look quite picturesque and might be worth visiting occasionally, but there's no way I'd want to live in those overpriced urban enclaves.