Federal Judge Orders IN To Recognize Terminally Ill Woman’s Same-Sex Marriage

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

With the possible exception of child custody where in the absence of a marriage, their biological father would likely have legal precedence over her partner, none of the reasons given here require a recognized marriage to take care of in accordance with Ms. Quesney's wishes.  Of course, child custody alone is more than sufficient and probably the main reason the judge ruled as he ruled.

I think those who are fighting the rear guard action against state recognition of same-sex marriage are going to have to lighten up and provide some means by which same-sex couples can enjoy the same legal advantages marriage provides, even if it does not do so in one fell swoop as a marriage does, if they are to have any chance of delaying the inevitable.  Won't prevent the inevitable, as at this point, only the retirement or incapacity of one of the majority in Winsdor can do that, and even then, that would likely only add additional delay.  So I can see why no one is interested in enacting half measures into law that satisfy no one.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

The federal government has no right in this matter. This is simply immoral. Time to nullify.

Indeed.  People have rights and Indiana's efforts to interfere with the plaintiff's rights have been nullified.