SENATE BILL: The Save Our Sharks Act of 2014 (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 11:44:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: The Save Our Sharks Act of 2014 (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: The Save Our Sharks Act of 2014 (Law'd)  (Read 1633 times)
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« on: April 19, 2014, 04:41:10 AM »

This was originally X's bill, but I decided to sponsor it because it seemed to address a critical issue. On average, 100 million sharks are killed by humans each year, some species have suffered decreases of 70% in the last 20-30 years, and a quarter of all species are in danger of extinction. This bill is a good first step to solving that problem.

Amendment is friendly.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2014, 02:50:47 PM »

Amendment is hostile.

I see your point shua, that we shouldn't be punishing a country which can't afford to prosecute people who cut off the fins, so I wouldn't mind further amendments but there needs to be some sanctions against those who can prosecute, but choose not to.

Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2014, 11:27:59 AM »

Nay
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2014, 07:34:22 PM »

Amendment is friendly
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2014, 10:16:29 AM »

I think, after this amendment, we're ready for a final vote.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2014, 05:50:27 AM »

Aye
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2014, 03:25:22 PM »

I wouldn't be completely opposed to a redraft changing it to only banning the consumption of endangered sharks, though finning, regardless of how endangered the animal is, is a fairly disgusting practice. I'd also presume that atlasia has a better policy in these areas anyway than the US.

It's sort of irritating that this objection has only just been discovered though.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: May 02, 2014, 04:22:37 PM »

I think the redraft that is desired is something along the lines of banning the consumption and killing only of actually endangered sharks.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2014, 02:51:03 PM »

That redraft is fine by me.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,277
United Kingdom


« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2014, 03:52:11 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.