what's the point of a predictive model if one of the factors cannot be determined until after the election? That kind of voids the whole predictive thing.
This. ^^^^^ This times infinity! This is what I have been saying all along. How on Earth are some of you people saying, "well, he
technically called Hillary winning the popular vote since Johnson didn't end up getting 5%"
? It's mind boggling. No. No he did not. By definition neither Lichtmann nor his model "called" or "predicted" any such thing since the "prediction" would have to be based on a factor not know until after the event. Now can we please consider the Lichtmann keys dead and buried for good?
