1.) the status of biological evolution as a scientific theory is somehow different or set apart from that of other scientific theories such as gravity or relativity.
I think you might want to change this - technically biological evolution is different from theories such as gravity or relativity since it's a different theory. I get your meaning though. I suggest "biological evolution is not a valid scientific theory." or something like that, just to make the meaning clear.
I propose an amendment to strike the whole bill and replace it with:
Section 1:
Evolution and Creationism should be taught side by side
Which creationism? There's lots of different creation stories, so which ones should we teach?
