London 2008 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:18:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  London 2008 (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: London 2008  (Read 19646 times)
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« on: September 10, 2007, 02:12:23 PM »

Boff has quite a strong starting base in the Tories - I would give Boris the edge but I'd rather see Boff get the nod a sthe Ken machine really don't have much on him, bar his sexuality. Would Ken's men try and use that against him? Damn right they would.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2007, 11:01:42 AM »

Boff has quite a strong starting base in the Tories - I would give Boris the edge

Is there actually a chance that Johnson won't be the Tory candidate?

Oh yes. We excercise this strange notion of internal party democracy in mayoral candidate selection Wink The race to be the London mayoral candidate has only really begun. Internally, Boris is well liked, but it would be ludicrous to say that Boff doesn't have a chance. I think he'd be a better candidate than Boris and I hope that filters through to the primary voters.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2008, 08:06:27 AM »


Lol @ turnout indeed. But at least we gave voters the chance to participate in an open primary.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2008, 01:56:02 PM »

The Evening Standard claim they've got a poll putting Johnson at 47%.

Any other numbers for this poll?

YouGov polled Boris 49% and Ken on 37%
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2008, 02:33:11 PM »


Lol @ turnout indeed. But at least we gave voters the chance to participate in an open primary.

Why don't you do it for MPs then?

In alot of selections we do; Hammersmith for example.

When I say 'we'; I mean the Tories.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2008, 04:57:07 PM »

It seems Livingston is really struggling but can anyone actually conceive of Johnson being elected 

About 49% of Londoners polled it seems Smiley

I think they are just tired of Ken's 'jobs for the boys' (and 'money for the boys') city hall.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2008, 10:14:30 AM »

London Assembly constituencies are nicely gerrymandered against LDs.  The five yellow seats are in three separate constituencies. 

I tend to find Londons seats the most 'sane' of any of the old mets (with the exception of the West Midlands) What hurts the Lib Dems in some parts of London is that their support is not as concentrated as Tory or Labour support, which is still based along class/economic lines.

They are in danger of loosing seats, on the Westminster level in swathes of the 'Thames Wedge'; straddling the river from Surbiton through to the City of London where the Tories made strides in 2005 (and some of their easiest targets are there next time round). It will be interesting to note Boris' support there.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2008, 07:05:20 AM »

As much as I'd love to see a swing *to* Labour in the GLA (some of Labour's candidates in marginal seats are pretty good compared to those from 2004) I don't think it's especially likely. Interesting to see that Livingstone is apparently no longer running ahead of the rest of Labour. Numbers for both main parties still look too high.

True. It appears Livingstone's personal vote has taken a hit (and Boris seems to have a personal vote of his own - either that or 'anyone but Livingstone')

Good to see UKIP down, but that was expected after a fairly strong performance that year nationwide. I anticipate the BNP vote will be higher, though YouGov has fairly acceptable methodology for encouraging shy voters to express their preferences. Not perfect of course. I'd forgotten about the CPA - i'll look forward to seeing the voting patterns for that shower.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2008, 08:00:03 AM »

I would guess a mixture of both; the lolBorisasMayor!!!11 vote probably won't turn out, but Livingstone has been hated in some of the suburbs for decades.

I suspect that Livingstone believed Boris would 'defeat himself.' It's always Livingstone's arrogance that gets the better of him as may be the case in May.

The BNP are only running in one constituency (City and East) so they won't poll higher than that. On the constituency vote anyway. They are also running on the list and will certainly poll higher than that (high enough to win a seat as well. Urgh).

Which will of course be quite the coup. It will of course make them more of a legitimate threat, though might have idiots in the press saying how PR is terrible because it lets in the BNP in (ignoring the threshold in place)


If you've got them Smiley I've been keeping track of the vote shares of these sorts of parties in the UK. They often have different guises and public faces but have the same people, money and churches behind them.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2008, 12:58:01 PM »

Nice to see the voting pattern in Chiswick. I think my Chris might be a bit p-ed off though Smiley

--

Boris Johnson says 'no thanks' to BNP support.

I utterly and unreservedly condemn the BNP and have no desire whatsoever to receive a single second preference vote from a BNP supporter.  I hope as many Londoners as possible turn out on May 1st to prevent the election of a BNP candidate.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2008, 03:06:18 PM »

Boris Johnson says 'no thanks' to BNP support.

I utterly and unreservedly condemn the BNP and have no desire whatsoever to receive a single second preference vote from a BNP supporter. 
Didn't say anything about their first preferences so the headline is misleading. Tongue

He was responding specifically to the BNP requesting those who vote for them second preference Johnson.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2008, 03:10:16 PM »

Boris Johnson says 'no thanks' to BNP support.

I utterly and unreservedly condemn the BNP and have no desire whatsoever to receive a single second preference vote from a BNP supporter. 
Didn't say anything about their first preferences so the headline is misleading. Tongue

He was responding specifically to the BNP requesting those who vote for them second preference Johnson.
That much was obvious. Smiley

So whats the problem? Unless you think that Labour and the Tories shouldn't lance the boil by getting potential BNP voters to stick with the sane parties Smiley
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #12 on: April 03, 2008, 07:47:22 AM »

Nice to see the voting pattern in Chiswick. I think my Chris might be a bit p-ed off though Smiley

Is he not a Tory like you are? Wink

No. But he wouldn't vote Labour if you paid him Cheesy

Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2008, 01:04:44 PM »

None of the 'wee diddy parties' for me thanks Smiley

1. Boris Johnson.
2. Brian Paddick
3. Siān Berry
4. Ken Livingstone.

1. Conservative Party
2. Liberal Democrats
3. Green Party
4. Labour Party
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #14 on: April 24, 2008, 02:38:17 PM »


OK, where's the catch? Merger of two "Christian Parties". Their policies look half-way reasonable. I can't help thinking something is up though.


They are a front for the Green/Hargreaves 'Chrsitian Voice' w@nkmobile. Quite a few of the membership have been involved in unsuccessful 'entryist' politics in a few Tory (and one Labour IIRC) constituency parties. They are horrible people pretending they are 'Christian Democrats like in Europe.'

Everything I said was 100% biased but I had to face down the b*stards under another name up here.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2008, 07:58:01 AM »


No.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #16 on: April 25, 2008, 09:39:07 AM »

(currently torn between Berry and German)

Gag.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #17 on: April 25, 2008, 10:11:48 AM »
« Edited: April 25, 2008, 10:13:40 AM by afleitch »


So saying 'Boris Johnson (gag)' is all right but a half assed attempt at a parody is worth you telling someone to piss off? Roll Eyes Why the hell would you want to vote for German anyway? I can understand Berry from what I know about you, but German? That's why I 'gagged'
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #18 on: April 25, 2008, 10:15:46 AM »

I just realised why you might have said what you did, because I capitalised 'German' - that wasn't what I was meaning.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #19 on: April 26, 2008, 09:04:48 AM »

Fact of the day - Brian Paddick says he became a 'born again' Christian at the age of 24.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #20 on: April 28, 2008, 07:14:22 AM »

YouGov have Boris up 11%... not much movement in their poll to be honest (Boris +2/ Ken -2 on first preferences and a little movement on second preferences).

Its worth bearing in mind that no UK pollster has a good record polling the London races.

True. If anything, it's a battle of the polsters and of methodology. YouGov are really trying to prove that they can poll well in sub national polls.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #21 on: April 29, 2008, 02:18:04 PM »


You should read the pleading commentary in the Guardiken Cheesy
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #22 on: April 29, 2008, 02:49:32 PM »

Ken on Kate Hoey - 'a sort of semi-detached member of the Labour Party in recent years'

Oh really and what what were you Ken Roll Eyes

As much as I would welcome Hoey to the Tory front benches (along with Frank Field and Gisela Stuart) I don't think she should have the whip withdrawn despite demands. Tories advised Brown in his hallowed 'Govt of all the talents' (and left/quit unceremoniously...) and their position as Conservative MP's was not under threat. If Hoey wants to advise Boris on sport should she win then it's a step in the right direction by our party too.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #23 on: May 01, 2008, 02:23:55 PM »

Is it May 1st or April 1st?

Harry's Place claims that 'a little birdie' has said Ken used to be a Young Conservative in Streatham in the 60's.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,958


« Reply #24 on: May 01, 2008, 04:04:07 PM »

ConHome...strangely and prematurely...call it for Boris.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 8 queries.