Santorum to kids of gay parents: You'd be better off with a dad in jail

[Simfan34]

Will blacks and whites at some point silently agree that things worked a lot better for both sides when negroes stuck to the ghetto?

[Simfan34]

Really?

[Simfan34]

Clearly Santorum's a good guy:

He's the closest thing to a communitarian running.

I'm a communitarian, and I don't support Santorum.

[Simfan34]

Can we somehow appoint the Alternate History admin to replace Dave Leip? He would immediately solve a lot of this forum's problems.

No, please no.

[Simfan34]

Ian shall rule our glorious land with his benevolent iron fist.

Though the only problem would be that I can't be a troll anymore.

I too have had my Ian run-in... no.

[Simfan34]

I am certainly not so naive as to think homosexuals will ever be readily accepted into the mainstream the way that preferring Pepsi over Coke is, for example.

In what sane place is prefering pepsi over coke acceptable? That's just wrong. What if suddenly a majority of people started drinking pepsi instead of coke? Coca Cola would go bankrupt and we'd all be forced to drink pepsi instead.

Pepsi is un-American. Everyone is Cokist.

Seriously, stop with these useless theoreticals.

Will homosexuals and heterosexuals at some point silently agree that things worked a lot better for both sides when open homosexuals stuck to San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York?

Fair or not, and I certainly have no problem with homosexuals or homosexuality unlike most folks I know, homosexuals will never be embraced by society at large to the degree they fantasize about. Unfortunately, they will always be treated as second-class except where they are heavily concentrated. The best they could have ever hoped for was having their own mecca in San Francisco. AIDS kind of prevented that, I guess.

That's trolling and you're kicked for a week.

YOU SCARED THE FRIGGIN BEJESSUS OUT OF ME!

[Simfan34]

Will homosexuals and heterosexuals at some point silently agree that things worked a lot better for both sides when open homosexuals stuck to San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York?

Fair or not, and I certainly have no problem with homosexuals or homosexuality unlike most folks I know, homosexuals will never be embraced by society at large to the degree they fantasize about. Unfortunately, they will always be treated as second-class except where they are heavily concentrated. The best they could have ever hoped for was having their own mecca in San Francisco. AIDS kind of prevented that, I guess.

That's trolling and you're kicked for a week.

If I was trolling, you'd know it. I know how to troll, and this is NOT trolling.

That's trolling. Don't troll.

Ian, I'm telling you, it was my brother who posted about that "PESTO CRUST PIZZA", not me. Why don't you respond to my emails?

[Simfan34]

Liberals are so open-minded and tolerant until they find out there are different ideas than their own.

I have been neither vulgar nor inappropriate. If you want vulgar and inappropriate on this subject matter, try having this conversation with African-American Democrats in Detroit.

I consider you claiming that I will never be accepted in society (without any real evidence or convincing testament), and that implying that I should move to New York, San Francisco, or some other "sanctuary city" if I want to be accepted, sort of inappropriate and vulgar on your part.

The way I see it, and I certainly do not like this, negroes will always be treated as second-class except where they are most heavily concentrated. That's why I suggested that perhaps relations would be better if things reverted to the way they were before slavery where most blacks either kept a low-profile or moved to Africa.

We could do this all day.

I support gay marriage. The leader of the Democratic Party, your party, does not. Furthermore, gay marriage is more staunchly opposed by African-American Democrats than any other group in America. Why is that?

Then why are you doing this???

[Simfan34]

Liberals are so open-minded and tolerant until they find out there are different ideas than their own.

I have been neither vulgar nor inappropriate. If you want vulgar and inappropriate on this subject matter, try having this conversation with African-American Democrats in Detroit.

I consider you claiming that I will never be accepted in society (without any real evidence or convincing testament), and that implying that I should move to New York, San Francisco, or some other "sanctuary city" if I want to be accepted, sort of inappropriate and vulgar on your part.

The way I see it, and I certainly do not like this, negroes will always be treated as second-class except where they are most heavily concentrated. That's why I suggested that perhaps relations would be better if things reverted to the way they were before slavery where most blacks either kept a low-profile or moved to Africa.

We could do this all day.

I support gay marriage. The leader of the Democratic Party, your party, does not. Furthermore, gay marriage is more staunchly opposed by African-American Democrats than any other group in America. Why is that?

Then why are you doing this???

Supporting gay marriage =/= being fine with gay people.

Uh, unless you're some kind of rigid libertarian, which Politico is not, they kind of are synonymous.

[Simfan34]

sage

yea

[Simfan34]

It's over.

[Simfan34]

Wait a damn minute! An eleven page argument about something related to Santorum and I haven't posted here once before this? There is something wrong with the Atlas Forum these days, my friends! Something very wrong.

FF, quite funny. Was wondering that myself.