Pro-Life People Only: How Should Abortion be Punished?

[°Leprechaun]

"Pro-life" support Capital Punishment. Anybody see the irony?

If you want to be truly pro-life support pacifism.

[°Leprechaun]

You know, if we just kill everybody, then there won't be any more abortions! Ever!

Definitely something to consider.

There's a certain logic here.

[°Leprechaun]

You know, if we just kill everybody, then there won't be any more abortions! Ever!

Definitely something to consider.

There's a certain logic here.

If we were ever to use all those nuclear weapons, we could certainly kill a lot of people.
Where do pro-lifers stand on nuclear disarmament?

[°Leprechaun]

You know, if we just kill everybody, then there won't be any more abortions! Ever!

Definitely something to consider.

There's a certain logic here.

If we were ever to use all those nuclear weapons, we could certainly kill a lot of people.
Where do pro-lifers stand on nuclear disarmament?

Probably not true for all the wanna-be murderers in this thread, but the nuclear arsenal sure should be brought down, perhaps not to zero but quite substantially through bilateral measures. You still need to project a degree of power though they should never be used. I tend to be anti-war altogether, but it's a bit dangerous to give up all power and negotiation like that.

A reasonable statement and one that I could agree with, but I don't think that Trump is the ideal choice, if you hold this view.

[°Leprechaun]

You know, if we just kill everybody, then there won't be any more abortions! Ever!

Definitely something to consider.

There's a certain logic here.

If we were ever to use all those nuclear weapons, we could certainly kill a lot of people.
Where do pro-lifers stand on nuclear disarmament?

Probably not true for all the wanna-be murderers in this thread, but the nuclear arsenal sure should be brought down, perhaps not to zero but quite substantially through bilateral measures. You still need to project a degree of power though they should never be used. I tend to be anti-war altogether, but it's a bit dangerous to give up all power and negotiation like that.

A reasonable statement and one that I could agree with, but I don't think that Trump is the ideal choice, if you hold this view.

Trump is the second most anti-war of the Republican candidates and possibly all candidates.

So, you think that he is more anti-war than Sanders?