Gustaf,
It's pyscho babble because you're essentially arguing with me about what the definition of the word negative is!!!
Yes, being against something CAN lead to a negative attitude towards that issue, but my point is, as I've said several times, more about emphasis and actually seeking to find a positive alternative.
A Democrat in the 1940's saw social ills and wanted to fix them with a better solution. A Democrat in the 1990's saw social ills and wanted to bitch about them to illustrate how awful the US is and how evil Republicans are. That obviously does not apply to ALL Democrats, but it fairly sums up what I mean by the "glass half empty" view versus the "glass half full" view.
But I do think that your view of this as negative is based on the fact that you don't think it's true. Change the US to Nazi-Germany and Republicans to Nazis in that sentence of yours and you might see my point.
Listen, dont compare the Republicans to the Nazis, because the Nazis were liberals. Discouraging of Christianity, Socialist economic policies, believing the govt is always right, sounds like liberalism to me. No differant than Stalin or Pol Pot or Castro or any other one of your cronies
