OK: just the main parties? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 04:33:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  OK: just the main parties? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OK: just the main parties?  (Read 1542 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,945
United Kingdom


« on: April 11, 2007, 07:04:59 AM »

Why would a frontier state (at that time) give a socialist 16% of the vote? Because Teddy Roosevelt (Bull Moose) couldn't get on the ballot, so most of his supporters voted for Debs as a protest.

Not so; Debs took 8% there in 1908 (when he was polling just under 3% nationally) and Benson took 15% there in 1916. Note that the Socialists were strongest in the likes of Little Dixie rather than in more Republican areas.
The reason for the sharp Socialist decline in Oklahoma after the First World War is because their organisation was cynically destroyed by the state's political establishment during the war (of course this goes for the Socialist Party across the U.S in certain respects; but the repression was worse in Oklahoma than elsewhere).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.