Earliest Signs of Red-State Blue-State Divide (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 09:56:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Earliest Signs of Red-State Blue-State Divide (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Earliest Signs of Red-State Blue-State Divide  (Read 11170 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


« on: April 13, 2007, 09:27:45 PM »

Absurd and (especially as far as '68 goes; the idea that all Wallace's voters would have gone for Nixon over Humphrey is absurd) hackish. This is a typical example of the tendency of people to look for evidence to back up an already reached conclusion rather than to look at evidence in order to come to a conclusion.

Oh as for California, this is the '68 map:

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,890
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2007, 12:16:28 PM »

If anyone actually needs any proof that "South Park Conservative" is but a hack, this is the result that'd you'd actually get if you add all of Wallace's voters to Nixon:



Oh and here's a map of HHH's vote:



He took 43% nationally (for those interested, in much (but not all) of the U.S, there's a correlation (not perfect o/c) between union strength and HHH's map).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.