Red New England? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 10:13:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Red New England? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Red New England?  (Read 3090 times)
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,401
Russian Federation


« on: April 13, 2014, 12:12:38 AM »

So you people are telling me that the only thing keeping Republicans from doing well in the Northeast is abortion and gay marriage?

Lol no, but social conservatism just makes it impossible.

+1. New England has it's share of "reasonable fiscal conservatism", but accent here is on "reasonable". It's mostly pro-environment too. So, Republican party would need very different candidates, then it usually runs now. Tupper or Cohen in Maine, Rudman in New Hampshire, Stafford and Jeffords in Vermont, Weicker or Rell in Connecticut, Chafee's in Rhode Island, Brooke or Weld in Massachusetts could conceivably win even now, but all of them could have big problems in present day Republican parties of their own states..
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.