Democrats only: 4 wishes... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 09:09:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Democrats only: 4 wishes... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Choose four candidates.
#1
David M. Alameel (TX)
#2
Gordon Ball (TN)
#3
Mark Begich (AK)
#4
Shenna Bellows (ME)
#5
Bruce Braley (IA)
#6
Travis Childers (MS)
#7
Amanda Curtis (MT)
#8
Joyce Dickerson (SC)
#9
Dave Domina (NE)
#10
Alison Lundergan Grimes (KY)
#11
Kay Hagan (NC)
#12
Charlie Hardy (WY)
#13
Brad Hutto (SC)
#14
Connie Johnson (OK)
#15
Mary Landrieu (LA)
#16
Nels Mitchell (ID)
#17
Michelle Nunn (GA)
#18
Greg Orman (KS)
#19
Mark Pryor (AR)
#20
Matt Silverstein (OK)
#21
Natalie Tennant (WV)
#22
Mark Udall (CO)
#23
Rick Weiland (SD)
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Democrats only: 4 wishes...  (Read 4699 times)
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
Russian Federation


« on: March 01, 2015, 12:17:48 AM »


Exactly my choices too. Though i am Indie... With my ONLY criterion being electability.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
Russian Federation


« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2015, 01:28:21 AM »


Pryor and Childers are unelectable in their states in present political climate. That's why i omitted them, despite the fact that i like both.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
Russian Federation


« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2015, 05:06:56 AM »
« Edited: March 02, 2015, 05:09:37 AM by smoltchanov »

Other than Rick Weiland (kinda) and Amanda Curtis all of them were really conservative wehateourownparty wearerepublicanslite Democrats.

I don't know if any of them should have been saved, really.

Braley and Udall - conservative? You have peculiar set of political views.... Both are at least - moderate liberals. And both ran in not too liberal states, and lost not because they were insufficiently liberal, but, may be - because they were too liberal. Essentially the same - with Begich and Hagan. And Curtis was so much more liberal then Montana is, that she had zero chances from first day of campaign.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 14 queries.