This is how your 2013 tax dollars were spent. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 10:36:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  This is how your 2013 tax dollars were spent. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: This is how your 2013 tax dollars were spent.  (Read 656 times)
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,280
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« on: April 23, 2014, 07:57:17 PM »

Looks like they've excluded Social Security and Medicare?

When discussing matters of budgetary economics, it is not preferable to follow the hypothetical mandates of the federal government. Social Security and Medicare should be included.

Income tax revenue doesn't pay for SSI or Medicare.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,280
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2014, 11:07:36 PM »

Income tax revenue doesn't pay for SSI or Medicare.

Income tax is not supposed to pay for Medicare, but it does, particularly all of the senior citizen bills that are dumped onto Medicaid.

Anyway, you found the relevant information. This dollar only represents federal income tax spending.

Medicaid is for poor people who cannot pay for health insurance. It's only reasonable that that includes poor senior citizens who cannot pay premiums for Medicare Part B. Unless you think someone who has the misfortune of being both old and poor should just be SOL.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,280
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2014, 08:22:52 AM »

Medicaid is for poor people who cannot pay for health insurance. It's only reasonable that that includes poor senior citizens who cannot pay premiums for Medicare Part B. Unless you think someone who has the misfortune of being both old and poor should just be SOL.

Seniors need two universal healthcare systems? This country has jumped the shark.

Medicare Part B isn't the problem. Long term care is the problem. People in the lower middle class have to be bankrupted by unexpected medical bills so grandma/grandpa can live long enough to let the LTC providers bilk the taxpayer.

First of all, neither of those programs are universal healthcare systems. One is specifically for elderly people. The other is specifically for the poor.

Unfortunately, there are some senior citizens who are so poor that they are dual-eligible. However, senior citizens as a whole are much less likely to be poor today than they were in the days before Medicare and Medicaid.

I'm not sure what the solution for long-term care costs is. It's the flip side to people now living long enough and medical treatments advancing enough for people to even get to the point of needing long-term care. It's worth pointing out that hospices, which were once strictly not-for-profit entities, have become a cash cow of sorts for for-profit operators.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.