SENATE BILL: NATO Membership Reform Act (Law'd)

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Aye.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Nay.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

What is the benefit from expanding the alliance in this fashion? What is the vision for the alliance I suppose I am asking?

Friends don't leave friends out of mutual defense pacts .

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

What is the benefit from expanding the alliance in this fashion? What is the vision for the alliance I suppose I am asking?

It could be that the more countries involved, the more manpower/weaponry/ bases etc the alliance has access to, so it would make it even more formidable. Though I think that Atlasia is so militarily advanced that it's not in any real danger from anyone, it could help the smaller nations. Also it would probably mean atlasia footing less of the bill in terms of operations, because it would make up less of the organisation.

Give me your opinion then, since you voted no. I am having trouble making up my mind here.


Also, shua, what is your opinion on this cost savings advocacy?

I wouldn't mind expanding NATO, but I don't like the 3rd section because I think that decision should be made by all of NATO, not us unilaterally making suggestions, when and if expanding it becomes an option.

All of NATO would still have to vote on it.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Aye.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Quite the strange breakdown already wrt the traditional left-right spectrum.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Quite the strange breakdown already wrt the traditional left-right spectrum.

Indeed, my past bills seem to have that effect, xD

Aye.

I suppose this is where we separate the hawks from the doves and then let the hawks loose on the doves to kill them and take their meat home to the eyasses.