Electoral Votes, 2012-2020 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:05:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Electoral Votes, 2012-2020 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Electoral Votes, 2012-2020  (Read 6874 times)
Bogart
bogart414
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 603
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -5.39

« on: November 30, 2004, 02:48:17 PM »
« edited: November 30, 2004, 02:53:45 PM by Bogart »



Here are the most recent projections from the following site.

http://www.polidata.org/census/est003dl.htm

Is this the formula you used? This is how the seats are apportioned currently.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equal Proportions Method

P - represents a state's total population

n - represents the number of seats a state would have if it gained a seat (because all states automatically received one seat the next seat gained is "seat two," and the next "seat three," and the next "seat four," and so on.)

The multiplier equals (1 divided by (the square root of n(n-1)) [which is called the reciprocal of the geometric mean]. Computing these values is quite easy using a PC and a good spreadsheet package.

Thus the formula for calculating the multiplier for the second
seat is:

          (1 divided by the square root of 2(2-1))
                               or
                   1/1.414213562 or 0.70710678

the multiplier for the third seat is:

          (1 divided by the square root of 3(3-1))
                               or
                   1/2.449489743 or 0.40824829

the multiplier for the fourth seat is:

          (1 divided by the square root of 4(4-1))
                               or
                  1/3.464101615 or 0.288675134

          Continue until an appropriate number of multipliers
          have been calculated.

Once the "multipliers" have been calculated, the next step is to multiply this figure by the population total for each of the 50 states (the District of Columbia is not included in these calculations). The resulting numbers are the priority values. Make sure you compute enough multipliers to cover the largest amount of seats in the House of Representatives that any one state stands to gain. Multipliers and priority values must be calculated for the largest number of seats assigned to a state. For example, if the largest number of seats assigned to a state is 50, multipliers and priority values must be calculated for the 50th seat. If you are using a PC, compute multipliers for seats 2 through 60. This will assure you have enough multipliers for apportionment.

Once you've calculated priority values for each state for the total anticipated seats, the next step is to rank and number the resulting priority values starting with seat 51 until all 435 seats have been assigned (remember, each state automatically received one seat). Next, tally the number of seats for each state to arrive at the total number of seats in the House of Representatives apportioned to each state.

Keep in mind, my map lists EV's so you have to subtract 2 from each state to get the House delegation size.
Logged
Bogart
bogart414
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 603
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -5.39

« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2004, 07:19:37 PM »

It depends on which Census projections you use. As was pointed out to me, many of them are projections from the 1990 Census which vastly overstate the growth in California. The projections from the link above are more current. The Census is going to release projections based upon the 2000 Census next year. These should be a lot more accurate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.