Robert Mugabe named chair of the African Union (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:43:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Robert Mugabe named chair of the African Union (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Robert Mugabe named chair of the African Union  (Read 1548 times)
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


« on: January 31, 2015, 01:52:29 AM »
« edited: January 31, 2015, 01:57:58 AM by Charlotte Hebdo »

As the outgoing head of SADC that was basically inevitable since it is Southern Africa's turn to lead the AU. There is an established practice of regional rotation: East, North, Southern, Central and West Africa. And it is only for a year.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2015, 02:10:24 AM »

The most controversial head of the AU since FIVE YEARS AGO. I'm surprised it's been that long.

He is replacing Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz from Mauritania. A two time coup leader from a country which has actual slavery and in 2011-12 AU was led by Teodoro Obiang -  who has ruled Equatorial Guinea longer than Mugabe has ruled Zimbabwe and is an even worse tyrant.

This is a shame because Southern Africa has some of the best leaders on the continent, but there have been people just as bad heading the AU. Mugabe is just better known in the West.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2015, 05:03:29 AM »
« Edited: February 02, 2015, 05:05:05 AM by Charlotte Hebdo »


But otherwise it has done little to its credit, and perhaps the biggest joke of all is that there is an African country that is not in the AU- Morocco, as the AU ridiculously continues to recognise the not-and-never extant SADR as a member. To be areal force for good the AU would need to abandon the principle of "non-interference" that discredited the OAU and limits its ability to be an agent of progress. Of course, the issue is that there are more African leaders who are at least illiberal in their style of rule than those who are not, so the introduction of interventionist doctrines such as R2P or whatnot is tantamount to opening Casandra's Box.


The continued Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara in violation of international law is a disgrace and it would be very wrong of the AU to recognize it. Of course the EU is an even bigger hypocrite for not implementing economic sanctions against Morocco.

R2P is part of article 4 of the AU charter, so they do have the possibility of enforcing it if a higher number of African governments become democratically elected and/or the most important ones decide to act more decisively in genocide/ethnic cleansing scenarios. SA and Nigeria have most of the responsibility here.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2015, 09:07:46 AM »
« Edited: February 02, 2015, 09:17:12 AM by Charlotte Hebdo »

It was wrong for Morocco to invade Western Sahara but what's done is done. Too many Moroccans have been born there.

The rights of an indigenous population do not seize to exist just because the settlers outnumber it. Sometimes there need to be repatriation.

I know this can seem ironic given my views on Palestine, but in this case the settlement was conducted by a people that already had a nation state.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.