SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE: Judiciary (Check and Balances Amendment) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 09:04:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE: Judiciary (Check and Balances Amendment) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE: Judiciary (Check and Balances Amendment)  (Read 7973 times)
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,762
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« on: May 20, 2013, 12:52:23 PM »

If I'm entitled to chime in, I'd argue that participating in political debate isn't what's at issue. It's participating in such a way as to compromise Atlasians' expectations of a fair trial that's at issue. It's possible to enter the fray without jeopardizing confidence in the judiciary. I'd ask, though, if that's how someone like Justice Bgwah has really operated. It is hard to confidently expect a fair trial from someone who has hurled personal insults at people over political affairs.

So my question for the Justices is this: If a jurist's behaviour can be seen as seriously compromising the integrity of the Supreme Court, should that individual be impeached? Moreover, do you believe that Justice Bgwah's activities constitute a breach of public confidence?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 11 queries.