Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:05:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified?  (Read 3999 times)
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,761
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« on: August 04, 2015, 11:21:31 AM »

I believe we will never see a state actor use a nuclear weapon again precisely because the world got to see the effects of nuclear warfare at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It's devastating to think about, but a bomb has to be used at least once before nuclear deterrence can work. And in the vacuum of the war, it seems like these bombings had a lower death count than what we would have seen with a land invasion. So it's win-win, as morally perverted as that sounds.

But you've got to have that death and destruction first for the world to know that these are weapons that should never be used. A mushroom cloud on an island would not suffice.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.