Trend Map is more revelant for 2016 Presidential Election:2004/2012 or 2008/2012

[hopper]

So the question is which trend map is more revelant to the 2016 Presidential Election? 2004/2012 or 2008/2012? Since 2008 was a Dem Wave I think 2004/2012 might be more revelant because it balances out the 2008 trend map.

[hopper]

The West will trend R again like in 2012, only because Hillary will be the candidate.
The Midwest will trend R again, because of Walker.
The South will trend D again because of Hillary.
The Northeast will trend D again because of Hillary.
So, 2012 it is.

Well The West The West Coast should trend to Hillary. The Northeast I don't know about except for Vermont and New York trending towards Hillary. I think the Northeast trend will be a wash except for VT and NY probably.

2004/2012 or 2008/2012 Trend Map?

[hopper]

What I think will be the likely Walker Clinton trend map.

Well I don't know how Hillary could do any worse than Obama did in Utah in 2012.

[hopper]

Scott Walker would win Hawaii?

Riiiiiiiiiight.........

......it's a trend map. "rolls eyes"

Trend map or not, Hawaii could not be won by a R.

Well Bush W. only lost the state 6% in 2004.