I am very disapointed in those senators who have voted. Harry is a knowledgble senator, but I don't know as of yet, whether he is the right pick for attorney general. I'd like to see how he would answer some of my questions and the questions of senators. I refuse to vote for a senator who will not work to bring this to a debate, instead of a straight vote.
Were you clamoring for the senate to question StevenNick?
I suppose you have a point, but I actually do think that it may be a good idea to establish a precedent of questioning potential nominees before voting. It couldn't hurt. Now's as good a time as any to start.
Well, I have a pretty simple queston for Harry. What are your thoughts on the
current amendment and statute that we're working on? Is it a good idea? Should we change anything?
