Filibuster compromise (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 02:26:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Filibuster compromise (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you support the compromise position reached regarding the filibustering of judicial nominees?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No, I support the Democratic position
 
#3
No, I support the Republican position
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: Filibuster compromise  (Read 950 times)
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« on: May 26, 2005, 02:11:00 AM »

Personally, I think that this particular agreement is stupid, because of course there aren't going to be many Republicans who will perceive any of Bush's appointments as "extraordinary", and since it's an entirely subjective issue, they'll just yell about it no matter what if any Democrat tries to filibuster anyone at all.

Regarding whose side I take, I don't even really care, as this issue is one of my cold-button issues.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2005, 02:11:17 PM »

It seems more Republicans would compromise and more Democrats just want to have it their own way. Smiley

Neither really compromised, from what I know of the deal.  The Republicans still have the nuclear option and the Democrats still have the filibuster, so it seems to me that we're basically right back where we started, except for the fact that three judges get to go up for a vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.