Acceptance of Science Bill [Failed] (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 02:30:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Acceptance of Science Bill [Failed] (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Acceptance of Science Bill [Failed]  (Read 21988 times)
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« on: April 23, 2007, 06:05:49 PM »

1.) the status of biological evolution as a scientific theory is somehow different or set apart from that of other scientific theories such as gravity or relativity.

I think you might want to change this - technically biological evolution is different from theories such as gravity or relativity since it's a different theory. I get your meaning though. I suggest "biological evolution is not a valid scientific theory." or something like that, just to make the meaning clear.

Nobody's saying that it's not a valid theory.  The main assertion is that its being a theory implies a lesser likelihood of it being false.  I'd make it something like "the idea that biological evolution's status as a scientific theory implies that it is any less likely to be true than other scientific ideas".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.