US-Israeli Relations After the Election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 01:18:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  US-Israeli Relations After the Election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US-Israeli Relations After the Election  (Read 13971 times)
Velasco
andi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,739
Western Sahara


WWW
« on: March 20, 2015, 11:38:53 AM »

In some ways this is the end of a masquerade. Forced by the political tide, Bibi left hypocrisy and put the cards on the table: there will be no Palestinian state under his tenure. That resounding promise to a radicalised electorate, confident because of the Israeli military superiority and the unconditional US support, makes every statement by US and EU officials on the two-state solution sound ridiculous. In any case, there are no indications that something is going to change. Both USA and Europe will find more comfortable lowering their heads. Replacing useless negotiation and occasional admonitions by pressure, which is the only way to deal with the Israeli administration, is something that won't happen. A sample of that is the reaction of the EU authorities. Federica Mogherini tweeted: "I congratulate Netanyahu for his victory in Israel and look forward to work together with the new government". See, "working together" on a fictional solution which Bibi explicitly rejects. It's sad and regrettable, but the crimes of the Bibi administration will continue unpunished. It's depressing, but as someone wrote in Haaretz, Bibi is what Israel deserves and Bibi deserves to govern Israel. Also, Bibi is what deserves the so called international community.

Logged
Velasco
andi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,739
Western Sahara


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2015, 02:44:24 PM »


Jews are a majority in Israel, they have a stronger position since the democracy argument is less powerful. Israel also does not have racism enshrined in their constitution despite all the apartheid hyperbole. If the   existence of Israel was really threatened I would still expect most Western governments to back it.

The "Apartheid hyperbole" is used to describe a real situation of discrimination existing in the Israeli state (affecting to a greater extent Arab Israeli minority, but not only), as well as the open-air prison regime which suffers the population in the Occupied Territories. While I think that it's not correct to qualify the crimes of the Israeli state in the OT as "racist", they are still crimes based on discrimination and the territorial segregation in the West Bank and the isolated Gaza resembles that of Apartheid South Africa. Also, the Israeli society inside the legal borders may not be racist, but for sure there exists a high dose of classism, even among Jews. Furthermore, the quality of a democracy can be measured by the respect for minorities. In that regard, Israel has a huge democratic deficit.
Logged
Velasco
andi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,739
Western Sahara


WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2015, 12:03:56 PM »

Among possible consequences, there is optimism among Arab countries that the US would not veto a new UN resolution recognizing Palestine.

It would be a little step forward, but I'll believe it when I see it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.