Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
Posts: 13,674
|
|
« on: May 16, 2014, 09:39:32 AM » |
|
|
« edited: May 16, 2014, 09:46:32 AM by Oldiesfreak1854 »
|
Yes, to some extent. While I can understand why Parliament would've wanted to tax the colonists as part of paying off their war debts, I would also agree with the Patriots that it wasn't right to have "taxation without representation." If Parliament had allowed the colonial legislatures to pass/collect the taxes, or if they had allowed colonists to be represented in Parliament, then I think I would've been fine with them.
However, as a fiercely loyal person, I don't think it would have been right to sever ties to the king without a legitimate reason. As for westward expansion, I think it was only right that the British Crown keep its promise to the Native Americans. But in the case of the way the taxes were initiated, I think the colonists did have a legitimate reason to revolt.
If I had to guess where I would've landed at the time, I suspect I would have remained neutral, maybe even siding with the Patriots ultimately. But if I had supported the Patriots, I certainly wouldn't have been zealous about it.
|