Local Office of IDS Emperor Scott - Salisbury, NC (Back in Business) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 12:51:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Local Office of IDS Emperor Scott - Salisbury, NC (Back in Business) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Local Office of IDS Emperor Scott - Salisbury, NC (Back in Business)  (Read 57218 times)
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« on: January 07, 2014, 02:17:03 PM »

Recently the Legislature passed a law that drastically reforms our election laws.  To summarize, the bill sets regionwide elections for three out of five Representatives, and assigns the other two seats to be elected in districts.  After much consideration, I have decided to endorse this measure as a way to promote competitive races.  Though I do have certain reservations about potential "gerrymandering," or abuse of the redistricting process, I find this new system worthwhile, and I hope I have the opportunity to work with the Legislature on this issue if I am elected this month.

The program should be as flexible as possible, and we should always be mindful of ensuring competitive elections.  While I do not think the district maps should be constantly 'tweaked' to force competitive races, I believe there ought to be full transparency in how Representatives draw the maps.  I would also like to explore implementing a requirement that the Legislature be in unanimous consent on the maps before they go into effect.

It's an intriguing idea. Given the nature of Atlasia though, the main problem will be people moving districts rather than the maps themselves.

Will the districts be elected by IRV or FPTP?
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2014, 03:15:59 PM »

Recently the Legislature passed a law that drastically reforms our election laws.  To summarize, the bill sets regionwide elections for three out of five Representatives, and assigns the other two seats to be elected in districts.  After much consideration, I have decided to endorse this measure as a way to promote competitive races.  Though I do have certain reservations about potential "gerrymandering," or abuse of the redistricting process, I find this new system worthwhile, and I hope I have the opportunity to work with the Legislature on this issue if I am elected this month.

The program should be as flexible as possible, and we should always be mindful of ensuring competitive elections.  While I do not think the district maps should be constantly 'tweaked' to force competitive races, I believe there ought to be full transparency in how Representatives draw the maps.  I would also like to explore implementing a requirement that the Legislature be in unanimous consent on the maps before they go into effect.

It's an intriguing idea. Given the nature of Atlasia though, the main problem will be people moving districts rather than the maps themselves.

Will the districts be elected by IRV or FPTP?

That could be an issue.  If a bunch of people decide they don't like the guy representing the other district, they can easily register in another state and vote him out.  However, until we run into that problem, I am okay with trying the new system.

As to how they're elected, I assume we will still go by IRV.  The bill doesn't mandate any changes to how the votes are tallied.

Ok fair enough. It's an interesting idea. I'm looking forward to seeing how it works out.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2014, 03:49:30 PM »

I just realised I haven't endorsed you yet Tongue Endorsed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.