Opinion of the permabanned posters: Haley/Ryan

[Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries]

liberals like ER

topkek

Glad to see the radicalization chamber continues strong.

He votes for all these bans . Yet many hostile red avies aren’t banned yet .

If he hasn’t voted then we should require equal amount of conservative and liberal moderators . Also you took this out of context as I said “bow down to liberals”

How many conservatives on this website don't have some sort of severe mental problem or come across as a potential terrorist? Five or six, maybe? Lmao. That's the real problem here. As hostile and stupid as liberals are, they rarely behave the way that an average internet conservative behaves. That's why conservatives get banned from every platform.

Should Crane and Ferguson be banned then cause they behave even worse than H/R did . Like H/R was a good faith poster who was pretty book smart too . Like yes he should have learnt not to take the bait as much as he did but isn’t that the problem of the people setting the bait to begin with in terms of forum rules .

Why are you guys always bringing me up for the whataboutism crap. If you think I broke the rules, then report the comment. Otherwise stfu.
And Haley/Ryan didn't need "bait." He vomited forth a lot of this stuff unprompted and unsolicited.

I'm not going to stfu.  Certainly not on you.  You obviously don't understand that you don't give orders here.

"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."

This is Saul Alinsky's Rule #4 of "Rules for Radicals".  This is practiced by Leftists here all the time, but when a conservative chooses to hold a Leftist to their own rules, they cry "Whataboutism!". 

People who do that are pathetic.  They are pathetic because they are people who can't live up to their own rules, but cry "Whataboutism!" when confronted with their inconsistencies.

You are one of the nastiest and ill-tempered posters around here.  You believe that the nobility of your political views allows you to be as nasty toward others here as you want to be.  People are calling you on this, and you cry, "Whataboutism!" because you are unwilling to look at your own inconsistencies.

[Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries]

OSR, you might find your complaints about red av toxicity gaining a lot more sympathy if you weren't bringing them up almost exclusively while railing against the bans of reactionaries who espouse loathsome bigotries that you insist don't exist because you didn't see them.

Get real.

In the current protests, in the events in Gaza, the Palestinians are the ones in the wrong.  They have no virtue and no merit in their arguments.  They want to use civilians as human shields, lob rockets at Israeli civilians.  They not only wish for Israel to not exist, they wish to drive every Jew out of "Palestine".  They have wanted this, and worked for this, ever since the Grand Mufti collaborated with Hitler in WWII.  

Haley/Ryan is Jewish in a country where Jew Hatred on the Left (which is tolerated here when it can't be blamed on the Right) runs rampant.  The complete denial of what the pro-Palestinian protesters are actually doing is shameful.  But the permabanning of Haley/Ryan is more that just bias; it is the Mod Team condoning the actions of Pro-Palestinian protesters and embracing the Palestinian cause.

OSR is a stand-up guy.  Red Avatars have loads of advocates here; Haley/Ryan deserves more than one.  And I consider his previous 6 month ban (to be kind) excessive.  

[Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries]

In the current protests, in the events in Gaza, the Palestinians are the ones in the wrong.  They have no virtue and no merit in their arguments.  They want to use civilians as human shields, lob rockets at Israeli civilians.  They not only wish for Israel to not exist, they wish to drive every Jew out of "Palestine".  They have wanted this, and worked for this, ever since the Grand Mufti collaborated with Hitler in WWII. 

The children being bombed are in the wrong?

The children being held hostage by Hamas are not in the wrong.

The children killed by Hamas rocket attacks in Israel are not in the wrong.

The children killed by Israel's response to the rocket attacks lies squarely with Hamas.  Hamas is the group that uses these children as human shields.  They are collateral damage caused by Hamas's unprovoked and unjustified attach on Israel on October 7.  No children would be killed if Hamas surrendered.  The same cannot be true if Israel surrendered.

[Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries]

Fuzzy, if we're gonna hold entire groups of people to the standard that they don't deserve anything regarding statehood because of collaboration with Hitler during the war, then why don't you apply that to all those who collaborated with the Nazis? Quisling in Norway, Pavelic in Croatia, Antonescu in Romania, Tiso in Slovakia, Bandera in Ukraine, and so on, and so forth.

And frankly, why are you conveniently ignoring the fact that it was the BRITISH who appointed al-Husseini as the Grant Mufti of Quds, which btw, was also a position created by them. You seem to be under the impression that he was elected into that position.

Well, yes, they WERE war criminals.  Father Tiso was executed.  Vidkun Quisling was executed.  Antonescu was executed.  Pavelic survived multiple assassination attempts.  Bandera was used as an informer, but he did not have a happy end.

Amin al-Husseni escaped punishment and continued to persecute Jews and encourage the persecution of Jews until the end of his life.  Unlike the other individuals you mention, his movement of anti-Jewish Palestinian Arab Nationalism was birthed by the Mufti and is the genesis for the Palestinian Arab Nationalist Movements that continue to this day and, in fact, are Jihadic and condone genocide toward Jews.  One reason the Palestinians in America spread the "Genocide Joe" narrative is to deflect from public intention the fact that "From the River to the Sea" is a statement of Ethnic Cleansing itself.