Ruling: Bono vs. Atlasia

[12th Doctor]

It is my oppinion that this is the most politically motivativated decisions I have seen in the history of Atlasia.  It is clearly the responsability of the Federal government to provide for the common good of its people.  At no time does this bill enforce restrictions upon the regions or any municipality.  Any other other Supreme Court in the history of this nation would have found in favor of my bill.  I find it nothing more than strange couriosity of history that we have at this time the most libertarian, hyper-individualistic, anti-social, selfish, and self-interested Supreme Court in the history of Atlasia.

I strongly believe that this bill is in the spirit of the powers amendment.  The man who wrote the ammendment agrees with me.

I am sadden by the precedent set by this court has set and encourage all fellow citizens living in poverty or who might be endanger of hitting hard times in the near future to move to our lovely neighbor to the north, if this nation countinues on its present course.

I appologize sincerely for all young women and fetuses who were left defensless by the actions of this court.  Truely, it appears that government of the plutocrats, by the few over meek has triumphed this day.

I would also like ot appologize to all my colleagues who struggled so hard to make this bill a reality.  Measured against the actions of the true governing body of this land, the Senate is a useless joke.

Perhapes FDR's court packing scheme was not such a bad idea afterall.  If Senators have no power, perhapes we should eliminate the Senate and all become Justices.  That way our opinion might acctually matter when compare to that of the fringe.

Once again I have been forced to call into question m support of the Chief Justices Presidential bid in the up coming race.  If he true is so against the concept of social justice that he will make up reasons to act against it, perhapes Senator Al Realpolitik will make the better choice after.  I believe that Christian Socialism is better than the absolute tyranny of the individual.

I believe that the people of Atlasia deserve a better explanation that the one given for the actions of this court.

[12th Doctor]

It is my oppinion that this is the most politically motivativated decisions I have seen in the history of Atlasia.  It is clearly the responsability of the Federal government to provide for the common good of its people.  At no time does this bill enforce restrictions upon the regions or any municipality.  Any other other Supreme Court in the history of this nation would have found in favor of my bill.  I find it nothing more than strange couriosity of history that we have at this time the most libertarian, hyper-individualistic, anti-social, selfish, and self-interested Supreme Court in the history of Atlasia.

I strongly believe that this bill is in the spirit of the powers amendment.  The man who wrote the ammendment agrees with me.

I am sadden by the precedent set by this court has set and encourage all fellow citizens living in poverty or who might be endanger of hitting hard times in the near future to move to our lovely neighbor to the north, if this nation countinues on its present course.

I appologize sincerely for all young women and fetuses who were left defensless by the actions of this court.  Truely, it appears that government of the plutocrats, by the few over meek has triumphed this day.

I would also like ot appologize to all my colleagues who struggled so hard to make this bill a reality.  Measured against the actions of the true governing body of this land, the Senate is a useless joke.

Perhapes FDR's court packing scheme was not such a bad idea afterall.  If Senators have no power, perhapes we should eliminate the Senate and all become Justices.  That way our opinion might acctually matter when compare to that of the fringe.

Once again I have been forced to call into question m support of the Chief Justices Presidential bid in the up coming race.  If he true is so against the concept of social justice that he will make up reasons to act against it, perhapes Senator Al Realpolitik will make the better choice after.  I believe that Christian Socialism is better than the absolute tyranny of the individual.

I believe that the people of Atlasia deserve a better explanation that the one given for the actions of this court.

I wish people would stop assuming this has anything to do with politics.  This decision is based on Constitutional law.  My personal opinions have nothing to do with this.  I didn't write the Constitution, I didn't write the Amendments, and I am simply working with what I have been given.

Anyone who ever claims that his personal opinions had nothing to do with any decision that they make is obviously lying.  That causes me to automatically distrust anything that yousay.

[12th Doctor]

Yes it does.

The only part of the bill that pertains to the regions is Article 2.  Article 2 is only a response to the bill past by Migredel that stated that no CHIP program was to reard the fetus as a human being.  i wish the Supreme Court Justices would acctually pay attention to the comings and goings of the government.  If they cannot do this, perhapes we can appoint some competent justices who can.

[12th Doctor]

Yes it does.

The only part of the bill that pertains to the regions is Article 2.  Article 2 is only a response to the bill past by Migredel that stated that no CHIP program was to reard the fetus as a human being.  i wish the Supreme Court Justices would acctually pay attention to the comings and goings of the government.  If they cannot do this, perhapes we can appoint some competent justices who can.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

It is unconstitutional for the federal government to tell the states(which are part of the regions) what to do with their money. If this was not your intent, that's too bad, but you wrote it in this manner. For this section to be constitutional(disregarding constitutional questions on CHIP programs) you can not require the states to resume their funding for these programs at any level.

You are more than free to write a new version of this bill, but it must conform to the limits imposed on the Senate by the Constitution.

At this point I would like to ask if the justice is stupid or simply not paying attention to what I have to say?

As I stated, the section is meant to repeal the law that was passed prior that disallowed any state from including fetus care in there CHIP programs.  I simply stated that those rates should be restored prior to what they were at before that law was passed.  Whether those rates be $0 or $1,000,000 I don't really care, nr does the bill dictate what shall be done after this restoration.  If the justices were nto trying to find excuses to bring my bill down, they would have picked up on that fact.  That is sloppy work on thier part, not on mine. 

[12th Doctor]

A lack of specification will inevitably lead to interpretation, which will inevitably lead to unbreakable disagreement as people of different ideologies apply their own interpretations.  I personally respect the decision of Justices John Dibble and KEmperor, even if I don't agree with it.  They did their job: interpreting the Constitution.  If you disagree with their interpretation, that does not mean that their interpretation was wrong.  What we need is to fix the problem of the Constitution's vagueness, not to attack the judges who had to deal with that vagueness.

I damn well think that their interprietation is:

a) WRONG

b) politically motivated.

The assumption is that Atlasia started out as the United States, with the same programs in place.  If their interpreitation is correct, hundreds of programs, including things such as student grants which are specifically targeted toward a certain group.

This is wrong, and I think it is dishonest of them to claim that their was no political motivation behind this ruling.