If you want fairness, start out by treating liberals fairly by not painting us all with the same brush. You seem quite fond of these generalizations of liberals, which then become de facto ad hominem attacks to discredit us when we have a good point.
Point taken. I do over generalize too much, but must of my generalizations are 70%-80% accurate, so nit picking them doesn't mean much.
And the hypocricy argument goes both ways. It's hypocritical to say Cheney and Bush's missteps are ok but not Gore's, too. I never said Gore's missteps were ok, and I don't think this is a big deal either, I understand Cheney may have forgotten meeting Edwards, that's fine. But still, the public deserves to know the truth. I wouldn't want people to go around actually thinking Gore invented the internet, I'm glad it was cleared up that he didn't. But to belabor the point and ignore the greater message is stupid. I'm not ignoring Cheney's point or discrediting it at all, I'm just playing fair by pointing out that he was wrong.
Eric, you lead the thread by saying "Cheney Lied...." That is more than just informing the public, that is an accusation.
Another thing I could go on about is all this "Bush Lied...." BS. Clearly, a lot (there happy?) of Democrats have forgotten that there is a difference between a lie and mistake. But, no, Bush gets no benefit of the doubt what-so-ever.