WikiLeaks DNC emails megathread

[Seriously?]

The Feds could shut down mega upload and Bodog, but they can't seize WikiLeaks?

The Feds can't indict an obviously corrupt Secretary of State that thought it was a good idea to have her own shadow e-mail server that transmitted classified information either....

[Seriously?]

Rut oh, Shaggy...

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/

[Seriously?]

Rut oh, Shaggy...

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/

Of course Atlas combines this into a Megathread. It's embarrassing to the Democrats. Meanwhile, there's no "Donald Trump is Satan" megathread.

[Seriously?]

REMINDER THAT WIKILEAKS IS RAN BY A RAPIST.

WIKILEAKS IS A PRO-RAPE SITE.

Funny. Wikileaks was perfectly acceptable to Democrats when it was releasing Iraqi War stuff.

[Seriously?]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-dnc-emails-wikileaks-2016-7

[Seriously?]

If it was about the RNC emails, our resident red avatars would be having a collective orgasm right now.

If it were the RNC e-mails, they'd be openly conspiring against Trump. Not so sure how orgasmic it would actually be for our resident red avatars, only that the threads would be multiple, not mega.

[Seriously?]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/wikileaks-revelation-dnc-hillary-moles-inside-bernie-campaign/

[Seriously?]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/wikileaks-revelation-dnc-hillary-moles-inside-bernie-campaign/

Lol linking the Gateway Pundit.

As opposed to Vox? Where do you expect the leaks to be repeated? The New York Times? /sarcasm

[Seriously?]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/wikileaks-revelation-dnc-hillary-moles-inside-bernie-campaign/

Lol linking the Gateway Pundit.

As opposed to Vox? Where do you expect the leaks to be repeated? The New York Times? /sarcasm

Just out of curiosity, would you consider Breitbart a biased source?

Of course Brietbart skews right. As does Gateway Pundit. I wouldn't use the word biased. Slanted perhaps. And that goes for the NYT/Vox, etc.

[Seriously?]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/wikileaks-revelation-dnc-hillary-moles-inside-bernie-campaign/

Lol linking the Gateway Pundit.

As opposed to Vox? Where do you expect the leaks to be repeated? The New York Times? /sarcasm

Uh...yes?

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/us/politics/dnc-emails-sanders-clinton.html?_r=1

A version of this article appears in print on July 23, 2016, on page A10 of the New York edition with the headline: Emails Suggest That Democratic Officials Scoffed at Sanders’s Campaign.

Buried.

[Seriously?]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/wikileaks-revelation-dnc-hillary-moles-inside-bernie-campaign/

Lol linking the Gateway Pundit.

As opposed to Vox? Where do you expect the leaks to be repeated? The New York Times? /sarcasm

Uh...yes?

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/us/politics/dnc-emails-sanders-clinton.html?_r=1

Lol, Trump Trolls really are useless tools.

And moderators calling people "useless tools" is really professional.

[Seriously?]

And we now have a spreadsheet that suggests that there was a little pay-for-play going on between the DNC and their donors, peddling influence for appointments to federal boards and commissions.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/leaked-dnc-documents-show-plans-to-reward-big-donors-with-federal-appointments/#ixzz4FOC85BU7

The source e-mail: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20352
Spreadsheet is attached to the Daily Caller story and redacted.

[Seriously?]

And we now have a spreadsheet that suggests that there was a little pay-for-play going on between the DNC and their donors, peddling influence for appointments to federal boards and commissions.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/leaked-dnc-documents-show-plans-to-reward-big-donors-with-federal-appointments/#ixzz4FOC85BU7

The source e-mail: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20352
Spreadsheet is attached to the Daily Caller story and redacted.

Donors are very regularly given positions on federal commissions. It will remain that way until Citizens United is overturned, something that if I remember correctly only one of the parties is aiming to do.

The party engaging in pay-for-play, right?

[Seriously?]

And we now have a spreadsheet that suggests that there was a little pay-for-play going on between the DNC and their donors, peddling influence for appointments to federal boards and commissions.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/leaked-dnc-documents-show-plans-to-reward-big-donors-with-federal-appointments/#ixzz4FOC85BU7

The source e-mail: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20352
Spreadsheet is attached to the Daily Caller story and redacted.

Donors are very regularly given positions on federal commissions. It will remain that way until Citizens United is overturned, something that if I remember correctly only one of the parties is aiming to do.

The party engaging in pay-for-play, right?

You could call it that, even if that is not what it is.  Will you condemn the Republican party for doing the same?  Most of the Congressional Interns on the Rep side are made up of kids of wealthy contributors, same with the staff members.  It happens all the time. 

I condemn the whole system. With that said, no changes in laws is going to change a thing about the system. "To the victor goes the spoils" has been true since the founding of the Republic.