The apology from Hillary

[JerryArkansas]

Of course not, cause she (like every other Leftis) thinks that cheating is ok - when you benefit from it. But if they don't and the other side is using their methods against them... Boy...

Anyone who leans left and didn't vote Hillary should apologize to America and the world for what they vainly, selfishly inflicted upon all of us.

I'm having trouble deciding which of you is worse.  Luckily my presidential ballot had more than two candidates on it so I didn't have to decide. 

I'll apologize if I hurt your feelings.  Mama always said I should apologize if I hurt someone's feelings unintentionally, so I don't mind:  I feel sorry for you if my vote for Bradford Lyttle hurt your feelings.  But I can tell you that if the Republicans and Democrats again nominate such unattractive candidates, I will again vote for an alternate, and again if I hurt you, precious, I'll again apologize to you.  And we can just keep doing that for as long as an apology means more to you than good governance.

Uh ... that shade was obviously not addressed to you

Biggest problem on this forum is people getting pissed off at something that has nothing to do with them.  Seems like many people, on both the left and right love getting angry.

[JerryArkansas]

If anything, the Democrat Party owes the people of the United States an apology for perpetrating this "deplorable" upon the American public as a candidate.   

That's who I've been blaming.  It's not Hillary's fault she sucked as a candidate, everybody should have known she did, it's why she lost in '08.  The Dems (apparently) had nobody else better.  That's entirely their fault, they had 8 years to prep one for us.

No matter how many times the haters say this, it will never be true. She got 3 million votes more than Trump, and it would have been a much larger margin, including an electoral college victory, if some of the pwecious snowflakes who were rooting for her to win had bothered to pitch in and help, rather than their "noble" "protest" of leaving it blank or #writeinBernie or whatever.

It's not Hillary's fault she ran up against a buzzsaw who added millions of voters to the rolls, reached out to Democrats like no Republican ever could have, and somehow still hung out to all of the "values voters" (ha!). And despite all of his unique advantages that no other Republican could have brought to the table, the American people were rooting for her victory by a landslide margin. She wasn't a terrible candidate or even a mediocre one - she would have trounced the other Republicans, and even had a clear preference of the electorate against the Republicans' strongest candidate.

She lost to Donald Trump. Therefore, she was a terrible candidate.

Also nobody campaigned to win the popular vote. They campaigned to win the EC, so using the "muh 3 million votes" argument is disingenuous at best.

Just like bernie lost to her, making him an even worse candidate?

And we would use the popular vote if we were in a country which wasn't stuck in the 18th century when it comes to elections.

[JerryArkansas]

If anything, the Democrat Party owes the people of the United States an apology for perpetrating this "deplorable" upon the American public as a candidate.   

That's who I've been blaming.  It's not Hillary's fault she sucked as a candidate, everybody should have known she did, it's why she lost in '08.  The Dems (apparently) had nobody else better.  That's entirely their fault, they had 8 years to prep one for us.

No matter how many times the haters say this, it will never be true. She got 3 million votes more than Trump, and it would have been a much larger margin, including an electoral college victory, if some of the pwecious snowflakes who were rooting for her to win had bothered to pitch in and help, rather than their "noble" "protest" of leaving it blank or #writeinBernie or whatever.

It's not Hillary's fault she ran up against a buzzsaw who added millions of voters to the rolls, reached out to Democrats like no Republican ever could have, and somehow still hung out to all of the "values voters" (ha!). And despite all of his unique advantages that no other Republican could have brought to the table, the American people were rooting for her victory by a landslide margin. She wasn't a terrible candidate or even a mediocre one - she would have trounced the other Republicans, and even had a clear preference of the electorate against the Republicans' strongest candidate.

She lost to Donald Trump. Therefore, she was a terrible candidate.

Also nobody campaigned to win the popular vote. They campaigned to win the EC, so using the "muh 3 million votes" argument is disingenuous at best.

Just like bernie lost to her, making him an even worse candidate?

And we would use the popular vote if we were in a country which wasn't stuck in the 18th century when it comes to elections.

Because clearly Todd Akin was the best candidate the GOP could put up in MO-Sen 2012 since he was the one who won the primary, right?

And yes, the American political system is hopelessly irrational, as evidenced by the fact that the main "left-wing" party nominated someone like Hillary Clinton in the first place.

I never argued this, did I.  I only said Bernie was a even worse candidate than her.