Maximizing geography of losing candidates (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 05:00:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Maximizing geography of losing candidates (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Maximizing geography of losing candidates  (Read 3040 times)
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,330
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
« on: November 22, 2014, 09:19:31 AM »

I realize there are some outstanding ballots and the results aren't finalized yet, but it's extremely unlikely anything will change in terms of the maps. (I used the most recent numbers from the CA SoS.)

Actual:


Jerry Brown     4,314,612  59.92%
Neel Kashkari  2,886,025  40.08%

Alternate:


Jerry Brown     4,314,612  51.07%
Neel Kashkari  4,134,613  48.93%

The last county to flip was Marin, which actually voted for Brown by a 79.4%-20.6% margin. Only San Francisco and Alameda remain, both of which were D>80%.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 10 queries.