Yes, in the sense that women deserve the same reproductive autonomy that men have. As far as rights of the embryo/fetus goes? That has mostly (if not everything) to do with the wishes of the mother. If the mother doesn't want to give birth to it than no, I don't think it has rights, nor is it a person.
What a wonderfully subjective little world view!
His position is subjective but has objectively beneficial social effects on living human beings. Your positions is subjective but has objectively negative social effects on living human beings.
All this talk of living human beings and yet you ignore the fact that abortion kills what is genetically human. The anti-science left strikes again.
Cancer cells are genetically human. Is it murder to have surgery to remove cancer?
Fundamentally, the question is what is an individual person, not what is human and alive. For pro-choice people, a fetus is not an individual person yet.